IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD C.C.C. NO.1224 OF 2018 (CIVIL) BETWEEN:
SRI. H. CHANDRAPPA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGE 63 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST KANNURU VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU-560049.
... COMPLAINANT (BY SRI SADASHIVAIAH K. G., ADVOCATE) AND :
1. SRI. MUNIKRISHNAPPA AGE 57 YEARS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENGALURU EAST TALUK PANCHAYATH OFFICE K. R. PURA BENGALURU-560036.
2. ROHITH , AGE. MAJOR, PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (PDO) KANNURU GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE KANNURU VILLAGE BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU-562149.
... ACCUSED (BY SRI H. THIMMAPPA FOR A1 & A2) THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT , BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.24690 OF 2013 AS PER ANNEXURE-F DATED 20.06.2013.
***** THIS C.C.C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This petition is filed on the ground that the order dated 20.06.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.24690 of 2013 by the learned Single Judge has been disobeyed.
2. In terms of the said order, an interim order was granted apparently for a period of one week to enable the learned counsel for respondent No.4 to file his objections. The contention of the accused is that the interim order was not extended. There is no material to indicate that the interim order was extended. Therefore, we find no ground to proceed further. Hence, the contempt proceedings are dropped.
SD/- SD/-
JUDGE JUDGE hnm