IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.508 OF 2016 C/W. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.507 OF 2016 IN CRP NO. 508 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
Sri. Gulriaz.B.M. S/o. Mohd. Yakoob C/o. U. Delighted Dry Cleaners And Medivel Chemists & Druggists Shop No.122/2, & 122/3 Old Madras Road Ulsoor, Bangalore-560 068. …Petitioner (By Sri.H.J. Sanghvi, Advocate) AND:
1. Sri M. Kempaiah S/o. Late.Mariappa (Since died by LR’s) 1(a). Smt. Nanjamma W/o. Late. M. Kempaiah Aged about 57 years 1(b). Smt. K. Manjula W/o. Sri.Chandrashekar D/o. Late.M. Kempaiah Aged about 34 years 1(c). Miss. K. Suma D/o. Late. M. Kempaiah Aged about 31 years 1(d). Sri.K. Srinivasa S/o. Late. M. Kempaiah Aged about 28 years All are R/at.No.121 Old Madras Road Ulsoor, Bengaluru-560 008. …Respondents (By Sri.S.V. Giridhar, Advocate for C/R1(d)) IN CRP NO. 507 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
Sri. N. Premchand S/o Late. Nemichand Aged about 60 years C/o. Heera Pawn Brokers Shop No.1/3, G.No.10th Street Old Madras Road, Ulsoor Bangalore-560 008. …Petitioner (By Sri.H.J. Sanghvi, Advocate) AND:
1. Sri M. Kempaiah S/o. Late.Mariappa (Since died by LR’s) 1(a). Smt. Nanjamma W/o. Late. M. Kempaiah Aged about 57 years 1(b). Smt. K. Manjula W/o. Sri.Chandrashekar D/o. Late.M. Kempaiah Aged about 34 years 1(c). Miss. K. Suma D/o. Late. M. Kempaiah Aged about 31 years 1(d). Sri.K. Srinivasa S/o. Late. M. Kempaiah Aged about 28 years All are R/at.No.121 Old Madras Road Ulsoor, Bengaluru-560 008. …Respondents (By Sri.S.V. Giridhar, Advocate for C/R1(d)) **** These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Section 18 of the Small Causes Courts Act against the judgment and decree dated 22.10.2016 passed in S.C.No.723/2012 on the file of the XIX Addl. Small Causes Judge, MACT and XLI ACMM, Bengaluru partly decreeing the suit for ejectment, damages and mesne profits.
These Civil Revision Petitions coming on for Admission this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER These revision petitions are directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 22.10.2016 passed in S.C.No.723/2012 on the file of the XIX Addl. Small Causes Judge, MACT and XLI ACMM, Bengaluru decreeing the suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs for ejectment of the vacant possession from the petitioners-defendants of the suit schedule property and other reliefs.
2. Both the counsel submit that during the pendency of the revision petition, the petitioners-defendants have vacated and handed over the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the respondents-plaintiffs.
3. The submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SSD Sd/- JUDGE