Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Gangahonnaiah vs Sarojamma D/O Late Karigowda And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|11 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1761/2016(RES) BETWEEN:
SRI GANGAHONNAIAH S/O PUTTAHONNAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT VAJARAPALYA HULIYURDURGA KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DIST - 572 123 ... APPELLANT (BY SRI.B C VENKATESH, ADV.) AND:
1. SAROJAMMA D/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. GANGADHARA S/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 3. GOWRAMMA D/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 4. BHARATHI D/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 5. HUCHAMMA W/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 6. GANGADHARA S/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 7. PADMA D/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 8. NANJAMMA D/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 9. CHIKKAMMA D/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 10. SATHISH S/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 11. THAYAMMA D/O LATE KARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 11 ARE RESIDING AT RAJENDRAPURA VILLAGE HULIYUR DURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DIST – 572 123 12. AKKAMMA W/O THIRUMALASHETTY S/O JAVARASETTY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 13. H T VENKATESHA W/O THIRUMALASETTY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 14. H T KRISHNASETTY S/O THIRUMALASETTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.12 TO 14 ARE RESIDING AT VAJARAPALYA HULIYUR DURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DIST – 572 123 ... RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 5.10.2007 PASSED IN R.A.NO.121/2001 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) KUNIGAL, PARTLY ALLOWED THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.11.1999 PASSED IN O.S.NO.95/1988 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC., KUNIGAL.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Though this Court passed a peremptory order dated 30-08-2017 granted time up to 07-10-2017 to comply with the remaining office objections, the office note indicates that the office objections have not been complied with on or before 07-10-2017.
2. In view of the peremptory order passed by this Court, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE mpk/-*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Gangahonnaiah vs Sarojamma D/O Late Karigowda And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
11 October, 2017
Judges
  • B A Patil Regular