IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO.38108/2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. G.R. RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE HOTTE PAKSHA RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/O NO.3, SHANKAR NAGAR 7TH MAIN, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT BANGALORE – 560 086.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMRUTHESH N.P, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1 . THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, NIRVACHAN SADAN ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110 001.
2 . PRASANNA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O NANJUNDAPPA RANGASWAMY HOTTEPAKSHA R/O NO.34, RAJA RAM MOHAN ROY ROAD SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 012.
AND ALSO AT:
(a) # 9, 2ND FLOOR, SUVARNA MANDIR 50FEET ROAD, MUNESHWARA BLOCK BANGALORE-85.
(b) #29, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD CROSS 1ST MAIN RAMANJANEYA LAYOUT CHIKKALASANDRA, BANGALORE – 560 061.
(c) # 77, 4TH CROSS, LIC COLONY JAYANAGAR, 3RD BLOCK EAST BANGALORE – 560 011.
(d) C/O SRI. V. SRINIVASA ADVOCATE NO.88, 1ST FLOOR, S.C. ROAD SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE – 560 020.
(e) # K-24, 1ST MAIN , 2ND CROSS KHB LAYOUT, BSK 3RD STAGE BANGALORE – 560 085.
3 . SRI. B.S. YEDDIYURAPPA S/O SIDDALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/O DAVALAGIRI, DOLLORS COLONY BANGALORE – 560 023 4 . SRI. U.B. BANAKAR MAJOR CHIKKONATHI P.O. HIREKERUR TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT – 581 110.
5 . SRI. BHOJRAJ MAJOR SARASAMBA, ALAND TALUK GULBARGA DISTRICT – 585 101.
6 . SRI. GURU PATIL MAJOR SIRRAVAL, SHAHAPUR TALUK YADAGIRI DISTRICT – 585 201.
7 . SRI. VISHWANATH PATIL MAJOR LINGADALL, BELAVADI POST BYLAHONGALA TALUK BELGAUM DISTRICT – 590 001.
8 . SRI. GURUPADAPPA NAGAMARAPALLI MAJOR H.NO.8-6-394/2, NAVADGERI BIDAR-575404.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.R. DODAWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; V/O DATED:18.10.2016 W.P. IS STANDS DISMISSED AS AGAINST R-2;
R-3 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED;
V/O DATED:26.08.2013 R-4 TO R-8 IS NOT NECESSARY) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO PASS THE FINAL ORDER IN ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS NO.509/42/13/RCC 500 PENDING BEFORE THE R-1 WITHIN A STIPULATED PERIOD OF TIME VIDE ANNX-M.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 has filed a memo stating thereunder that petitioner had sought for a direction to the first respondent to pass orders in Enquiry Proceedings No.509/42/2013/RCC500 pending before said authority and first respondent on 12.09.2013 has already passed a final order, rejecting the claim of petitioner. It is also stated thereunder that the order of rejection had been challenged before this Court in W.P.No.667/2014 which petition has also been dismissed on 09.04.2019. Hence, placing said memo on record and for reasons stated therein, this petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE RU