IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.261/2015 (SC) BETWEEN :
SRI. DINESH KUMAR S/O. NIRMAL JAIN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS LEO GARMENTS, NO.254/1, 2ND FLOOR AKKAM BUILDING, OLD THARUGUPET BENGALURU-560 053. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.J. SANGHVI, ADV.-ABSENT) AND :
SMT. A.C. LALITHAMMA W/O. LATE A.N. CHENNAIAH AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS R/AT NO.4/1, 15TH CROSS 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560 011.
REPRESENTED BY HER PA HOLDER MR.A.C. HARISH BABU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O. LATE A.N. CHENNAIAH. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G. NATARAJ, ADV.) THIS C.R.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.02.2015 PASSED IN S.C.NO.527/2013 ON THE FILE OF XIII ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT AND ARREARS OF RENT.
THIS C.R.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING :
ORDER Counsel for the petitioner absent. No representation.
2. Counsel for the respondent has filed a memo submitting that the petitioner/tenant has handed over the suit schedule premises to the respondent–owner on 15.2.2018. Hence, petition does not survive for consideration.
Considering the submission of the counsel, memo is taken on record. The petition is dismissed as the same has become infructuous.
Since the main matter is dismissed, I.A.1/2017 and I.A.1/2015 do not survive for consideration and the same is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE rs