IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.No.9966/2019 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN :
SRI. DHANUSH S/O. NAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT. SHAMBHAVI NILAYA OPPOSITE PVS KALAKUNJ KODIALBAIL MANGALURU – 575 003 D.K.DISTRICT (BY SRI.VISHWAJITH SHETTY S., ADV.) AND :
1. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK JAYANAGAARA BENGALURU – 560 041 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTARAR (EVALUATION) 2. THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK JAYANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 041 3. A.J.INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES ...PETITIONER KUNTIKANA MANGALURU – 575 004 D.K.REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N.K.RAMESH, ADV. FOR R1 AND R2; SRI RAJESH SHETTIGAR, ADV. FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO REFER THE ANATOMY SUBJECT PAPER (Q.P.CODE.1178 OF DECEMBER 2018) OF THE PETITIONER BEARING THE REGISTRAR No.15D7822 TO A THIRD INDEPENDENT EVALUATOR AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the parties submit ad idem that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.48194-198/2018 and allied matters disposed of on 21.12.2018 wherein a writ of mandamus has been issued to the respondent-University to send such of the answer papers of the petitioner, whereby, the percentage difference amongst the valuations (two in the case of U.G.
course and four in the case of P.G. course, as the case may be) in terms of 15.6.2012 Ordinance as worked out in paragraphs 25 and 26 therein, for third or fifth valuation, as the case may be, forthwith.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the subject matter of this writ petition being U.G course, the respondent-University shall send the answer papers of the petitioner in terms of the Ordinance dated 15.06.2012 as worked out in paragraph 25 of the order in the batch of writ petitions referred to above for third valuation, forthwith.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE HJ