Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri Devegowda vs Sri Channanayaka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|06 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD R.S.A.No.1752/2013 (SP) BETWEEN Sri. Devegowda Aged 50 years S/o Kalegowda D No.466, Koorahalli Belavadi Post Yelawala Hobli Mysore Taluk & District. ... Appellant (By Sri. B.S. Nagaraj, Advocate) AND 1. Sri Channanayaka Aged 57 years S/o Late Ninganayaka 2. Smt. Susheelamma Aged 52 years W/o Channanayaka 3. Smt. Manjula Aged 37 years D/o Channanayaka 4. Smt. Rajamma Aged 34 years D/o Channanayaka 5. Sri. Shivakumar Aged 25 years S/o Channanayaka 6. Smt. Geetha Aged 30 years D/o Channanayaka 7. Smt. Renuka Aged 28 years D/o Channanayaka Respondent No. 1 to 7 are residing at: Yelawala Village Yelawala Hobli, Mysore Taluk & District. PIN: 570 012.
8. Sri Marisiddegowda Aged 57 years, S/o Patel Chikka Ankegowda Mavinahalli Village Jayapura Hobli Mysore Taluk & District. PIN: 570 008.
9. Sri. Chandrashekar Aged about 49 years S/o Late Chikkanna No.221, 17th Cross 4th Main, Vidyaranyapuram Mysore.
10. Sri. J. Srinivas Aged about 42 years S/o late Javara Shetty No.131, 1st Floor, II Cross III Stage, Vijayanagar ‘A’ block Mysore. ... Respondents (By Sri.P. Nataraju and Sri P.S. Manjunath, Advocates for R8 Sri R.S. Ravi, Advocate for R9 and R10; R1 to R4 are served but unrepresented R5 to R7 is held sufficient) This RSA is filed u/s. 100 of CPC against the judgment & decree dtd. 17.07.2013 passed in R.A.No.206/2012 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Mysore and the judgment and decree dated 08.03.2012 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge at Mysore in O.S.No.1791/2007 and etc.;
This appeal coming on for orders, this day, the court delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal and also to direct the office to return the court fee paid by the appellant.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Registry is directed to refund the court fee to the appellant as per Section 66 of the Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.
SD/- JUDGE SSD
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri Devegowda vs Sri Channanayaka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
06 August, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad R