IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.326 OF 2013 BETWEEN:
1. SRI D. SUDHAKAR, S/O N.DASARATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. TRISHUL ENTERPRISES, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. SEVEN HILLS PROPERTIES PVT. LTD, AND M/S SEVEN HILLS DISTILLEORIES PVT. LTD., GOMMUTA NILAYA, BANGALORE ROAD, CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, KARNATAKA – 577 535.
2. SRI.V.N.AJITH PRASAD JAIN, S/O V.R.NAGARAJA JAIN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PARTNER, M/S. TRISHUL ENTERPRISES, NO.12, 4TH CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE, R/O SACHINAG, G.G.SAMUDAYA BHAVAN, STADIUM ROAD, CHITRADURGA - 577535.
3. SRI.K.V.HANUMAPPA REDDY, S/O LATE K.H.VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PARTNER, M/S. TRISHUL ENTERPRISES, NO.12, 4TH CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE, R/O MANCHANAHALLI, GAURIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-577535.
4. SRI G.M.RAMESH, S/O G.S.MARUTI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. MEERAMS OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 6-D, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, BIKAMPADY, MANGALORE R/AT NO.471, MARUTI NILAYA, 1ST CROSS, PAVAGADA ROAD, CHALLAKERE, CHITRADURGA – 577535.
(BY SRI AMAR CORREA, ADVOCATE) AND:
STATE BY CBI, REPRESENTED BY, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, BANGALORE – 560 032.
...PETITIONERS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI P PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 AND 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.03.2013 PASSED BY THE XLVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND S.J., AND SPL. JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, BANGALORE CITY IN SPL.C.C.NO.171/2009 AND THEREBY ALLOW THIS PETITION AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONERS WHO ARE ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 5 IN SPL.C.C.NO.171/2009, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 120B R/W 409, 420, 467, 468 AND 471 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 13(2) R/W 13(1)(d) OF P.C. ACT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent-CBI are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 23.10.2019 for withdrawal of the petition. Petitioner does not intend to pursue this matter, therefore, seeks to withdraw the petition.
3. Memo is placed on record.
4. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE BSR