IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.29382/2018 (T – IT) BETWEEN:
SRI D.NAGABHUSHANAM S/O LATE D.L.NARAYANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT No.1702, MAATHUSRI NILAYA, C BLOCK, SAHAKAR NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560092 ... PETITIONER [BY SRI VINAY KUTTAPPA K.S., ADV. FOR SRI GAUTAM S. BHARADWAJ, ADV.] AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL 3RD FLOOR, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(4) QUEENS CIRCLE BENGALURU-560001 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI DILIP, ADV. FOR K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO RELEASE THE SEIZED MATERIAL AND DOCUMENTS WHICH CAME TO SEIZED ON 12.09.2013, AS PER ANNEXURE-B [WHICH IS UN-DATED].
- 2 -
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo submitting that the relief sought in the writ petition does not survive for consideration in view of the seized documents/materials being returned to the petitioner.
2. Memo is placed on record.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is rendered infructuous and accordingly stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.