Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri D A Gnanesh vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|10 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.9503 OF 2019 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SRI. D.A. GNANESH S/O. LATE D.H. ANANTHARAMASHETTY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT C/O. COMFORT ZONE PG NO.61, 1ST N BLOCK DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 010. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAN, ADV. FOR SRI. S.S. MANU SHANKAR, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 086.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSION OF POLICE SOUTH EAST OFFICE 19TH MAIN, 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK BANGALORE-560 095.
4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE MADIVALA SUB-DIVISION LASKAR ROAD, HOSUR ROAD ADUGODI BANGALORE-560 030.
5. THE POLICE INSPECTOR KORAMANGALA POLICE STATION BANGALORE.
6. D.A. PRADEEP IMPERSONATED AS PRASAD ANANTHRAM S/O. LATE ANANTHARAMA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.111, 1ST FLOOR 1ST CROSS, 8TH MAIN CENTRAL EXCISE LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE-40. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri. Mohan, learned counsel for Sri.S.S.Manu Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri.Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 5.
2. The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.
3. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to such remedy as is available to the petitioner in law.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE *alb/-.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri D A Gnanesh vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
10 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe