IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1373 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1. SRI CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, SON OF LATE C.PILLAPPA.
2. SRI.C.MUNIRATHNAM AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, SON OF CHINNAPPA.
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.38, SIDDAPPA REDDY LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA, KRISHNARAJAPURAM, BENGALURU – 36.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VISWANATH SETTY V., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. SMT. BHARATHI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF B.M.NARAYANASWAMY.
2. SRI.B.M.MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS SON OF B.M.NARAYANASWAMY.
3. SRI.B.M.BALACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, SON OF B.M.NARAYANASWAMY.
4. SRI.B.M.NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS SON OF B.M.NARAYANASWAMY.
NO. 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT BASAVANAPARTHY VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT.
5. SRI.M.NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, SON OF LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, RESIDING AT CHENNAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
6. SMT.BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, WIFE OF B.M.NARAYANASWAMY, RESIDING AT BASAVANAPARTHY VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.04.2017 PASSED IN REGULAR APPEAL NO.62/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHICKBALLAPUR (SITTING AT CHINTAMANI), DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.01.2011 PASSED IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.29 OF 2008 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHINTAMANI.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT None appears for the appellants.
2. This Court on 6.2.2019 granted two weeks’ time to comply with the office objections, subject to the condition that the appeal would stand dismissed if the office objections are not complied with. The office objections have not been complied with despite this order.
3. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr