IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.29525/2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S. SRI.CHAMUNDESWARI SUGARS LTD., NO.88/5, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 025. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.K.R.NACHIAPPAN, S/O RAMASAMY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS.
(BY SRI.SHASHIDHARA H.N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR CANE DEVELOPMENT & DIRECTOR OF SUGAR, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, BUILDING ‘F’ COMPLEX ANNEXURE, 5TH FLOOR, CBAB COMPLEX, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 009.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA – 571 432.
…PETITIONER 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA – 571 432.
5. THE TAHSILDAR, MADDUR TALUK, MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 432.
6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.M.DODDY, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 432.
7. SRI.JAVAREGOWDA, S/O SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, FIELD TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE AT SRI.CHAMUNDESWARI SUGAR LIMITED, K.M.DODDI, MADDUR TALUK AND R/O GURUDEVARAHALLI VILLAGE, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK – 571 432.
8. SRI.MAHADEVA D.A., S/O ANNAJI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE, AT SRI.CHAMUNDESWARI SUGARS LIMITED, K.M.DODDI, MADDUR TALUK AND R/O D.A.KERE VILLAGE, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK – 571 432.
9. SRI. SANTHOSHA S., S/O SHANKAREGOWDA, AGE: 42 YEARS, TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE, AT SRI.CHAMUNDESWARI SUGARS LIMITED, K.M.DODDI, MADDUR TALUK AND R/O ANNUR VILLAGE, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK – 571 432.
10. SRI. MAHADEVASWAMY S., S/O SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE, AT SRI.CHAMUNDESWARI SUGARS LIMITED, K.M.DODDI, MADDUR TALUK AND R/O MANIGERE VILLAGE, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK – 571 432.
11. SRI. SREENIVASA H.K., S/O KULLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE, AT SRI.CHAMUNDESWARI SUGARS LIMITED, K.M.DODDI, MADDUR TALUK AND R/O JARALAHALLI VILLAGE, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK – 571 432.
(BY SRI.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R1-R6;
…RESPONDENTS SRI.T.NARAYANASWAMY, ADV. FOR R7 TO R11) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-3 TO 6 TO ENFORCE THE LAW AND TO MAINTAIN LAW AND ORDER IN THE SURROUNDING SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Memo has been filed seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. The same is taken on record.
2. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE VP