IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.9232 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
1. Sri Boregowda S/o Maadegowda Aged about 55 years Member, Dashavara Grama Panchayath R/o Dashavara Village Channapatna Taluk Ramanagar District.
2. Sri Ravikumar S/o Late Channaveeraiah Aged about 45 years Secretary, Dashavara Grama Panchayath R/o Makali Village Channapatna Taluk Ramanagar District.
3. Sri Ramakrishnaiah S/o Chikkamuddegowda Aged about 48 years Member, Dashavara Grama Panchayath R/o Dashavara Village Channapatna Taluk Ramanagar District.
4. Sri Venkatesh S/o Govindaiah Aged about 26 years Reserve Police Constable R/o Abbur Doddi Village Channapatna Taluk Ramanagar District.
(By Sri.Vijaykumar S.L., Advocate) AND:
1. State of Karnataka By M.K.Doddi Police Station M.K.Doddi, Channapatna Taluk Ramanagar District Rep. by SPP High Court Building Bengaluru- 560 001.
2. Rathnamma D/o Venkatesh Aged about 30 years Adhyaksha, Dashavara Grama Panchayath R/o Abburu Doddi Village Channapatna Taluk Ramanagar District Bangalore-560 010.
(By Sri.S.Chandrashekaraiah, HCGP) …Petitioners …Respondents This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to quash the proceedings initiated by the 1st Respondent police on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanagar in Spl.C.No.62/2017 U/S 504, 506, 342 R/w 34 of IPC and Sec. 3(1)(m), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) SC/ST (POA) Act as per Annexure-D and etc.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER Perusal of the records would indicate that on account of non-compliance of office objections, matter has been listed on more than three occasions. An order has been passed on 26.07.2018 to pay the costs, neither the cost has been paid nor the office objections have been complied. Even today, there is no representation. This only indicates that petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this petition. Hence, petition is dismissed.
In the event of an application for recall of the order is filed, Registry is directed to list the said application, only on receipt for having deposited the cost being enclosed.
Sd/- JUDGE SB