Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri B Sreerama Reddy S/O

High Court Of Karnataka|12 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12th DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.16999 OF 2014 (GM-BWSSB) BETWEEN:
Sri. B. Sreerama Reddy S/o. Late Byanna Age: 65 years R/at No.1773 7th Main, Judicial Layout Yelahanka Bangalore-560 065. … Petitioner (By Mr. V. Vinod Reddy for Mr. G. Papi Reddy, Advocate) AND:
1. BWSSB Represented by Chief Engineer Cauvery Bhavan Bangalore-560 009.
2. Assistant Executive Engineer BWSSB, Doddaballapur Road Yelahanka Bangalore-560 065. … Respondents (By Mr. M.H. Motigi, Adv.) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the letter dated 14.08.2013 demanding the petitioner to pay Rs.1,27,300/- vide Annexure-E by R2, and etc.
This Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ Group, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri.V.Vinod Reddy for Sri.G.Papi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
2. The petition is admitted for hearing and the same is heard finally.
3. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has inter alia assailed the validity of the demand notice dated 14.08.2013 issued by Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board by which the petitioner has been asked to deposit a sum of Rs.1,27,300/- on account of installation of meter.
4. When the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner be granted liberty to submit a detailed representation in response to the notice dated 14.08.2013 and the competent authority be directed to consider the said representation by a speaking order.
5. In case the petitioner files a representation in response to the notice dated 14.08.2013, the competent authority shall decide the representation filed by the petitioner by a speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE BNV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri B Sreerama Reddy S/O

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
12 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe