IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 625 OF 2018 (MON) BETWEEN:
SRI. B. MAYYADI, MAJOR D.NO.17, AVENUE-2 QUARTER TYPE (OLD) N.M.P.T. COLONY, PANAMBUR - 575 010.
... APPELLANT (BY SRI. VISHWAJITH SHETTY S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
STATE BANK OF INDIA A BANKING CORPORATION CONSTITUTED UNDER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA ACT, 1955, HAVING ITS CORPORATE CENTER AT MUMBAI, AND INTERALIA A BRANCH OFFICE AT PANNAMBUR BRANCH, PORT HOSPITAL COMPLEX, MANGALURU, DULY REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, RAMACHANDRA NAIK. M, SON OF KRISHNAPPA NAIK.M, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, PANAMBRU BRANCH, MANGALURU.
... RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.04.2017 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 57/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & CJM MANGALURU, D.K. ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING AISDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.08.2011 PASSED IN OS. NO. 608/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE MANGALORE, D.K.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellant. This Court on 26.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr