Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri B Manjunath And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Urban Development And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|31 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W. P. Nos.5219-20/2017 (S-RES) BETWEEN 1. SRI.B. MANJUNATH AGED 61 YEARS S/O BASAVALINGAPPA R/AT NO 1341/5, 3RD “C” CROSS SHIVAKUMARASWAMY LAY-OUT 2ND STAGE, DAVANAGERE 2. B.GURURAJACHAR AGED 64 YEARS S/O B.K. KRISHNACHAR R/AT NO 1253/A2/8 4TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS SHIVAKUMARASWAMY LAY-OUT 2ND STAGE, DAVANAGERE. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MAHESH.S-ADV) (ABSENT) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (MAHANAGARA PALIKE-2) VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 BY ITS SECRETARY 2. COMMISSIONER DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 9TH FLOOR, VISVESHWARAIAH TOWERS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.S.INDIRESH-AGA) THESE WPs ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS AT ANNEXURES-B1 TO B2 AND C1 TO C2 IN THE LIGHT OF THE DECISION OF THE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT AT ANNEXURE-A AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EXTEND THE BENEFIT OF RULE 247-A OF K.C.S.R. AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS TO THE PETITIONERS.
THESE WPs COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Case is called out. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
2. On 30.3.2017, matter was listed before the Registrar Judicial. On that day also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. However, a week’s time was granted for compliance. As there was no compliance within the time stipulated, matter was listed before the Court on 19.4.2017. On that day, time was granted till 31.5.2017 for compliance and ordered that failing to comply with the office objections, the matter be re-listed for dismissal.
3. Matter is listed today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
4. This shows that the petitioners are disinterested in prosecuting the petition in spite of sufficient time being granted. Hence, as per the order dated 19.4.2017, the petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE rs
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri B Manjunath And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Urban Development And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • G Narendar