IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA REVIEW PETITION NO.645/2017 IN WRIT PETITION No.3450/2017 (LR) BETWEEN:
SRI.B.H.ISMAIL, S/O LATE B.AHAMED KUNNI, BAKKARAVALLI, MALASAVARA, BELUR, HASSAN – 573 101.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI.SIDHARTH BABU RAO, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDINGS, BENGALURU – 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 101.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 101.
4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 101.
5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, AREHALLI HOBLI, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 101.
6. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, AREHALLI HOBLI, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 101.
…RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 02.08.2017 PASSED IN W.P.NO.34500/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER This matter had come up on 19.03.2019. There was no representation for the petitioner. It is listed today. Today also there is no representation.
2. Looked into the facts and ground urged in the review petition.
3. Admittedly, the writ petition is disposed of by order dated 02.08.2017 in the presence of learned counel Sri.A.Ravishankar appearing on behalf of petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved of the same, he has to challenge the same by filing a writ appeal. Further, he cannot engage an advocate unconnected with the matter when it was heard on 02.08.2017 and seek re-hearing of the same.
4. Therefore, the review petition cannot be entertained and it is accordingly, dismissed.
bnv* Sd/- JUDGE