IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2259 OF 2011 BETWEEN:
SRI B G VASANTH S/O LATE B T GOPALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/AT VINAYAKA, NEAR MANN’S COMPOUND, MADIKERI, KODAGU DISTRICT ... APPELLANT (BY SRI.SACHICN B S, ADV.) AND:
SRI ANANDA BHANDARI S/O SIDDU BHANDARI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NEAR SHANTHINIKETHAN BUILDING, GENERAL THIMMAIAH ROAD, MADIKERI, KODAGU DIST. ... RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.08.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.49/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MADIKERI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:01.04.2006 PASSED IN O.S.NO.38/1984 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) BANGALORE.
2 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the appellant for issuance of notice and gone through the judgment. The appellant is the defendant who is challenging the order passed by both the courts, which are concurrent in nature. I do not find any substantial question of law to be framed in this appeal or the judgments of the courts bellow need to be interfered with. Appeal accordingly stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE lnn