IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R. DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.57892/2018(S-RES) BETWEEN SRI. B. C. CHANDRAHASAIAH S/O CHELUVEGOWDA, AGED 63 YEARS, RETIRED LIBRARY ASSISTANT, *VISHWESHWARAPURAM ARTS AND COMMERCE EVENING FIRST GRADE COLLEGE, K.R.ROAD, V.V.PURAM, BENGALURU-560004.
R/AT NO.687, 5TH MAIN ROAD, SRINAGAR, BSK 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU.
(BY SRI PADMANABHA R, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COLLEGIATE EDUCATION PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
* corrected vide court order dated 24.02.2020 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, BENGALURU-560009.
4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL IN KARNATAKA (ENTITLEMENT AND ACCOUNTS) PARK HOUSE, BENGALURU-01 BENGALURU CITY-560 001.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT PRATHIMA M S, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE COMMUNICATION LETTER DATED 15.03.2016 AND COMMUNICATION LETTER DATED 31.03.2016 OPF THE R-4 ADDRESSED TO THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-B & C ARE UNENFORCEABLE, VOID AB-INITIO AND LEGALLY UNSUSTATINABLE IN LAW AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE SAME AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL):
Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for all the respondents.
2. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the communications dated 15.03.2016 and 31.03.2016 at Annexures-B & C to the writ petition. The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to reckon and count the service rendered by the petitioner from the date of entry into service i.e., 24.03.1981 and provide the difference in the terminal benefits by taking into account the date of entry into service.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that he was appointed as Library Assistant on 24.03.1981 by the Management of State Vokkaligara Sangha (R) and posted to work at *Vishweshwarapuram Arts & Commerce Evening First Grade College, K. R. Road, V. V. Puram Bengaluru. Thereafter, the appointment of the petitioner was admitted to the Grant-in-Aid, as per the memo dated 28.08.1991. The petitioner retired from service on 31.05.2015. The petitioner being aggrieved by the finalization of the revised pension claims, which are dated 15.03.2016 and 31.03.2016, is before this Court, assailing the same, since the revised pension is fixed reckoning the date of admission to salary grant and not date of entry into service.
* corrected vide court order dated 24.02.2020 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the very same question fell for consideration before this Court in several other writ petitions, including W.P.No.28122/2015, which was disposed of on 04.06.2018, where the decision of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.2467/2015 and connected appeals, was also taken into consideration.
5. However, having taken note that the writ appeals are pending and in the said writ appeals an interim order dated 27.11.2015 has been passed wherein the Hon’ble Division Bench had ordered that insofar as the superannuated employees, the pensionary benefits be paid taking into consideration the date of their initial appointment. This Court had held that the same is necessary to be paid to the petitioner as well. However, it was further held that the ultimate result would depend on the consideration to be made by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the said writ appeals.
6. In that view of the matter, a direction is hereby issued to the respondents to settle, disburse and pay the pensionary benefits payable to the petitioner taking into account the date of entry into service of the petitioner as 24.03.1981. However, if any general order is made by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the said writ appeals, at that stage, appropriate application of the same be made to the case of the petitioner as well and if on the other hand, if any contentions to assail the same arise at that stage, for the petitioner, the same is also kept open.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file her Memo of Appearance within a period of two weeks from today.
SD/- JUDGE DL