IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No.57818/2017 (GM – RES) BETWEEN:
SRI ARIF SYED S/O LATE SYED SIKANDER NO.63/A, 3RD CROSS T M RAYAN ROAD SIDDARTHANAGAR CHELURADI PALYA BANGALORE ALSO AT BEEMETAL WORKS NO.21, DR T M RAYAN ROAD BANGALORE …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY, ADV. – ABSENT.) AND:
1. M/s CITY FINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE INDIA LTD NO.001, RAHEJA CHANCERY NO.133, BESIDE BRIGADE TOWER BRIGADE ROAD BANGALORE-25 REP BY ITS MANAGER SRI RAJEEV TEHELKAR 2. M/s L & T FINANCE LTD., UNIT NO.6, 3RD FLOOR(#301) PRIDE HULKUL, NO.116, LALBAGH ROAD OPP.PASSPORT OFFICE BANGALORE-560027 REP BY ITS MANAGER SRI CHANDRA SHEKAR SHETTY …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO RELEASE THE ENTIRE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R None for the petitioner.
Perused records. The petition is admitted for hearing.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of mandamus to respondent No.1 to release the entire original documents of scheduled property in favour of the petitioner.
3. After perusal of the petition and in the fact situation of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction that in case the petitioner submits a representation to the competent authority of the respondent-Bank, the respondent-
Authority shall decide the claim of the petitioner by a speaking order within four weeks from the date of submitting the representation.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE ln.