IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.325/2017 BETWEEN SRI ABDUL FAROOQ @ BABU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O ABDUL RAHEEM R/A NO.101/A, 3RD CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, K H RANGANATH COLONY J J R NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560018. …APPELLANT (BY SRI HARSHA H M, ADV. ABSENT) AND 1. SRI MOHAMMED TANVEER AHMED AGD ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O SRI ABDUL SHUKOOR R/A NO.16, KRISHNAMMA GARDEN AYYAPPAN TEMPLE STREET MUBARAK MOHALLA J.C.NAGAR BANGALORE.
ALSO AT:
2. SRI MOHAMMED TANVEER AHMED C/O ALPHA STORES NO.9, RICHARD’S SQUARE SHIVAJI NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 051. .. RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER DATED 14.12.2016 PASSED BY THE XXI ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.7157/2016-CONVICT THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT FOR THE SENTENCE AS PRESCRIBED UNDER LAW FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 AND TO AWARD SUITABLE COMPENSATION IN FAVOUR OF COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT UNDER SECTION 357 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Appellant and the learned counsel for the appellant are absent. No representation. It is the eighth time the matter is posted for compliance of office objections. The appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE brn