IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION NO.19442/2016 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI A NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE SRI. ANANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT DODDAMARALI VILLAGE, NANDHI HOBLI, CHICKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-562102.
(BY SRI SANTOSH S. GOGI, ADV.) AND:
1. SRI N NARAYANASWAMY SON OF NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, ... PETITIONER 2. SRI CHENNAKESHAVAYYA S/O CHIKKABYERAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 3. SRI K.N. SRINIVAS S/O SRI. KARAGADA NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 4. SRI D.K. NARAYANASWAMY S/O DANDU KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 5. SRI. N. MURALI S/O SRI RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 6. SRI KARAGAPPA S/O SRI. MUNISONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 7. SRI G ASHOK S/O K. GOPALACHARYA @ GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 8. SRI. RAMACHARI S/O MUGINARAYANAPPA @ MUGINARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS SINCE DEAD, REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENT NOS.9 AND 10 9. SRI. NAGESHA CHARI S/O MUGINARAYANAPPA @ MUGINARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 10. SRI ANAND S/O MUGINARAYANAPPA @ MUGINARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 11. SMT. PADMA W/O NARASIMHA MURTHY D/O MUGINARAYANAPPA @ MUGINARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 11 ARE RESIDING AT :
DODDAMARALI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHICKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHICKABALLAPUR DISTRICT-562102 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIGNESHWARA U., ADV. FOR R1 NOTICE TO R2 TO R11 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S.NO.497/2015, ON THE FILE OF SECOND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHIKKABALLAPURA, TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 15.03.2016 AT ANNEXURE – R IN O.S.NO.497/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SECOND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHIKKABALLAPURA DISMISSING THE APPLICATION ON I.A.NO.IV UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 R/W. 151 OF CPC AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION BY REJECTING PLAINT ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 23.10.2017 seeking permission to convert the present writ petition into civil revision petition without assigning any reasons.
2. The memo is placed on record. As desired by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, he is permitted to convert the present writ petition into civil revision petition. Accordingly, for statistical purpose, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE nvj