Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sri A Mahadevaiah @ A Mahadevprasad vs Pramod Swamy And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|22 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION NOS.16322 OF 2019 AND 17818 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI A MAHADEVAIAH @ A MAHADEVPRASAD S/O LATE APPAJAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT ANKANATHAPURA VILLAGE ATHAGUR HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA- 571 421 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI K.N.NITISH FOR SRI K.V.NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATES) AND:
1. PRAMOD SWAMY S/O SHIVAMADAIAH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 2. KUMARASWAMY S/O SHIVAMADAIAH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT ANKANATHAPURA VILLAGE ATHAGUR HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK MANDYA-571 421 …RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER AT ANNEXURE-D, DTD:22.03.2019 AND ANNEXURE-F DATED:05.04.2019 PASED BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL 2 CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT MADDUR, IN SUIT O.S.NO.56/2006 AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo and submits that in view of the subsequent events, writ petitions may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to raise the grounds urged in the present writ petitions in the appeal, if he intends to prefer.
Sd/-
JUDGE BS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sri A Mahadevaiah @ A Mahadevprasad vs Pramod Swamy And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
22 April, 2019
Judges
  • B Veerappa