IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.3387 OF 2019 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
Sri. A. L. Raghavendra, S/o late A. R. Lokanath, Aged about 40 years, Residing at No.16, 2nd Cross, Arekempanahalli, End of Wilson Garden, Bengaluru – 560 027.
(By Sri. T. V. Nanje Gowda, Advocate) AND:
Smt. S. Prathima, W/o A. L. Raghavendra, D/o Siddagangaiah, Aged about 37 years, Residing at No.92, 9th Main, Kalappa Block, Srinagar, Bengaluru – 560 050.
… Petitioner … Respondent (By Sri. K. B. Sathyanarayana, Advocate) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 28.08.2018 passed in I.A.No.7 filed under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, in M.C.No.1803/2011 on the file of the Hon’ble I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Bengaluru vide Annexure – C by allowing this W.P. and etc., This Petition coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri. T.V. Nanje Gowda, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. K. B. Sathyanarayana, learned counsel for the respondent.
Petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 28.08.2018 by which the application filed by the respondent under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, has been partly allowed and the petitioner herein has been directed to pay `5,000/- per month to the respondent and the respondent has also been awarded `15,000/- by way of litigation expenses.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter before the family court is fixed for judgment on 13.03.2019.
4. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In view of the fact that the proceeding has already been fixed for judgment, it is well settled law that the life of the interim order is co-terminus with the main proceeding. At this point, I am not inclined to pass any order.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-