IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.6104 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
MR. SREENIVASA N.
S/O. R NARAYANA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.208, 2ND MAIN ROAD MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 080. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADV.) AND:
THE BRANCH MANAGER REPRESENTED BY CORPORATION BANK NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BRANCH NO.14/3, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. ...RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT BANK TO RELEASE THE TITLE DEEDS, PERTAINING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Mr. Vignesh Shetty, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
None for respondent.
2. In this writ petition, petitioner, inter alia, seeks writ of mandamus seeking a direction to the respondent-Bank to release the title deeds pertaining to the schedule property.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he be granted an opportunity to put forth his grievance by way of representation to the respondent Bank. Thereafter the respondent Bank shall decide the representation which may be submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order.
4. In view of the aforesaid submission and in the facts of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Bank that in case the petitioner submits a representation within a period of one week from today, the competent authority of the respondent Bank shall decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order within a period of one week from the date of such representation. This Court does not express any opinion on the claim of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE akc/-