Petitioner is the 9th accused, in Crime No.421 of 2014 of the Neeleswaram Police Station for the offences punishable under Secs.143, 147, 323, 353 and 332 r/w Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code, apprehends arrest and has filed this application.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application.
It is submitted that on 02.05.2014 at about 2.30a.m the police party, getting information about gambling in a public place reached there. Petitioner and others assaulted them and obstructed them from discharging their official duty.
3. Learned counsel submits that the allegations are not true.
4. The petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other case from the Neeleswaram Police Station. In the nature of the allegations made against the petitioner, I am inclined to think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence I am inclined to grant relief but subject to conditions.
Resultantly this application is allowed as under:
(i) Petitioner shall surrender before the officer investigating Crime No.421 of 2014 of the Neeleswaram Police Station on 10.06.2014 at 10 a.m for interrogation.
(ii) In case interrogation is not completed that day, it is open to the officer concerned to direct presence of the petitioner on other day/days and time as may be specified by him which the petitioner shall comply.
(iii) In case arrest of the petitioner is recorded, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day.
(iv) On such production the petitioner shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for `20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions:
(a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of the petitioner,
(b) Petitioner shall report to the officer investigating Crime No.421 of 2014 of the Neeleswaram Police Station on all alternate Saturday between 10a.m and 12p.m for a period of two months or till final report is filed, whichever is earlier.
(c) Petitioner shall report to the Investigating Officer as and when required for interrogation.
(d) Petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail.
(e) Petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses.
(f) In case the petitioner violates any of condition Nos.(b) to (e), it is open to the investigating officer to move the learned magistrate for cancellation of the bail as held in P.K Shaji Vs. State of Kerala (AIR 2006 SC 100).
Sbna True Copy Sd/-
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.
P A to Judge