IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.A. NO.570 OF 2014 (A) BETWEEN M/S. SREE GOKULAM CHITS & FINANCE CO.(P) LTD., NO.2894, 12TH MAIN ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560008.
NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS GPA HOLDER SRI. RAJA H.M., (BY SRI. H.K.SINGH, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND SRI. N.R.PRASAD, M/S. MAYURI VIDEO, NO.121, 1ST FLOOR, N.K.K.COMPLEX, S.P.ROAD, BENGALURU-560002.
... APPELLANT … RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.12.2013 PASSED BY THE XV ADDITIONAL JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES & 23RD ADDITIONAL CMM, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.31826/2006 ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I.ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The order sheet reveals that, in spite of granting three opportunities, learned counsel for the appellant has not complied with the office objection by furnishing the process fee, correct present address of the respondent for the purpose of issuing notice to the respondent etc.
This appeal having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the appellant nor his counsel present. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears the learned counsel for the appellant has no interest to prosecute this case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
KGR* Sd/-
JUDGE