Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Rajasekaran vs The Authorised Officer

Madras High Court|29 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Made by Huluvadi G.Ramesh,J) This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent Bank not to forfeit the sale amount for a sum of Rs.1,22,07,500/- deposited by the petitioner pursuant to the e-auction sale conducted by the respondent bank on 13.3.2017 and to extend the time to pay the balance sale amount for a sum of Rs.3,66,22,500/- to the respondent Bank.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank.
3. The respondent issued e-auction sale notice for selling the property mortgaged by a borrower in e-auction, since the borrower had failed to repay the amount. In the said auction held on 13.3.2017, the petitioner is the successful bidder and he paid 25% of the sale price. The petitioner applied for loan to pay the balance sale consideration and the bank has sanctioned the loan. However, the Bank could not release the amount, since the property was attached due to some third party claims. Though the petitioner made several requests to the respondent to take steps to raise the order of attachment and to issue and register the sale certificate in his favour, the respondent, without taking steps to raise the order of attachment, demanded the petitioner to pay the balance sale price, failing which, it would forfeit 25% of the sale price paid by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.
4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has paid the balance sale price and the respondent has also issued the sale certificate in favour of the petitioner on 28.6.2017.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of, recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and directing the respondent to register the sale certificate issued in favour of the petitioner. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, WMP No.17544 of 2017 is closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Rajasekaran vs The Authorised Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
29 June, 2017