Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

The Special Tahsildar (La) vs S.Arunachalam

Madras High Court|25 July, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The first respondent died during the currency of the Civil Revision Petition. The petitioner has not taken any action to bring on record the Legal Representatives. Even otherwise, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
To The Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Special Tahsildar (La) vs S.Arunachalam

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.