Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

The Special Land Acquisition Officer

High Court Of Karnataka|10 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G.NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A. NO.6072 OF 2017 (LAC) BETWEEN:
1. PADMAMMANNI, S/O LATE KRISHNE URS, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O KUDUKOORU/N.SHETTIHALLI BETTADAPURA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK.
2. K.D.RATHNAMMANNI, W/O LATE N.P.PUTTARAJE URS, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O KUDUKOORU/N.SHETTIHALLI BETTADAPURA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI.NAGESH.M, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, K.R./HARANGI PROJECT, MYSORE.
... RESPONDENT THIS MFA FILED U/S 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:02.01.2012 PASSED IN LAC NO.290/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, & JMFC, HUNSUR, SITTING AT PERIYAPATNA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is absent.
2. As per the order dated 11.12.2018, the appellants was granted three weeks time for compliance of office objections. Further it was ordered that if the office objections are not complied with, within a period of three weeks, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal.
3. Even today, the counsel for the appellants has not appeared and no steps have been taken for compliance of office objections. Hence, in view of the order dated 11.12.2018, appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and non- prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE HB*/BSR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

The Special Land Acquisition Officer

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
10 April, 2019
Judges
  • Ashok G Nijagannavar