Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Pattabi vs The Commissioner Of Chennai

Madras High Court|07 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the Corporation states that the impugned notice may be treated as withdrawn as, on verification, the stand of the authorities is that it is a poramboke land for which the Corporation is not the competent authority. As to whether there is violation or not, it is not for us to consider now.
2.Taking the aforesaid statement on record, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 stand closed.
(S.K.K., CJ.) (M.S., J.) 07.02.2017 Index : Yes/No Website : Yes/No sra To
1.The Commissioner of Chennai Corporation, Chennai.
2.The Executive Engineer, Zone-14, Corporation of Chennai, Puzhuthivakkam Main Road, Puzhuthivakkam, Chennai 600 091.
3.The Tahsildar, Shozhinganallur Taluk, Solinganallur.
4.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Chennai.
5.The Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.
6.The Commissioner, St. Thomas Mount, Panchayat Union, Chitlapakkam.
The Hon'ble Chief Justice and M.Sundar, J.
(sra) W.P.No.14630 of 2013 07.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Pattabi vs The Commissioner Of Chennai

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
07 February, 2017