Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sonu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26880 of 2018 Applicant :- Sonu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shravan Kumar Singh,Rajiv Lochan Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sikandar Khan Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sikandar Khan, learned counsel for the informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused Himachal has already been enlarged on bail by this Court by order dated 17.7.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15757 of 2018, copy of bail order produced by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused Himachal who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.
The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A., as well as learned counsel for the informant.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.
In view of the above, let the applicant, Sonu be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 472 of 2017, under Sections 307 and 504 I.P.C., P.S. Dadri, district-Gautam Budh Nagar with the following conditions :-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 27.7.2018 Faridul
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sonu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Shravan Kumar Singh Rajiv Lochan Shukla