Court No. - 7
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19655 of 2019 Applicant :- Sonu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kuamr Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.2734 of 2018, under Section 8/22 N.D.P.S. Act, P.S. Loni, District Ghaziabad with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The contention as raised at the bar by the learned counsel for the applicant is that as per prosecution, 120 gm Alprazolam is said to have been recovered form applicant; that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that no recovery has been made from the possession of applicant; that provisions of Section 50 N.D.P.S. Act have not been complied with; that co-accused Nadeem has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 07.02.2019, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5565 of 2019; that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of the co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity; that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial and that he is languishing in jail since 02.12.2018.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the submission of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicant and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
Let the applicant Sonu involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial Court
(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission, of which applicant is suspected.
(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or temper with the evidence.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it would be open to the prosecution to move for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 11.6.2019 Atul