Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sonu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13357 of 2021 Applicant :- Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pavan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
Perused the record.
Learned counsel for applicant submits that according to the case mentioned in gang chart, which is annexed at page-17 of the paper book, applicant has criminal history of one case in which he has been granted bail. The bail order has been brought on record at page- 19 of the paper book. According to learned counsel for applicant, there is no material against applicant to invoke the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986. Applicant has no other criminal history and applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Applicant is in jail since 10.11.2020.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Having heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for the state and upon perusal of material brought on record, nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and dictum of Apex Court in Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant- Sonu involved in Case Crime No.543 of 2020, under sections 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S.- Chandpur, District- Bijnor, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
1. Applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. He shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and shall cooperate with the trial.
3. He shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned.
In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.
Order Date :- 8.4.2021 Saif
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sonu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Pavan Kumar