Court No. - 62
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45879 of 2018 Applicant :- Sonu @ Shanu @ Shakir Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ali Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant be taken on record.
Heard Sri Ali Hasan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that three cases have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed as Annexure- 1 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application and in the said cases, the applicant has been granted bail by this Court as well as the court below. It is further submitted that the applicant was also wanted in two criminal cases other than gang chart, i.e., Case Crime No.61 of 2017 and 62 of 2017 in which he has been granted bail by the competent court. Further submission is that there is also no possibility of applicant either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicant is in jail since 12.4.2018. Applicant also undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the submissions advanced and the provisions for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act,1986, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let the applicant-Sonu @ Shanu @ Shakir involved in Case Crime No.93 of 2018, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Prevention Act 1986, Police Station- Shahganj, District-Jaunpur, be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 30.11.2018 Ram Murti