Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sonu Garg vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4891 of 2021 Petitioner :- Sonu Garg Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Srivastava,Virendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 01.06.2021 registered as case crime no.203 of 2021 under sections 147, 307 I.P.C. and 3 (2) (5) SC/ST Act, police station Hariparwat, District Agra.
The assertion of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner has come up during the course of investigation and he was not named in the FIR, is incorrect, as is evident from the bare perusal of the first information report. Any other argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not to be accepted for this reason only.
From a bare perusal of the FIR, it cannot be said that no cognizance offence is made out against the petitioner.
The writ petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 24.8.2021 AU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sonu Garg vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2021
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Virendra Kumar Srivastava