IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8028/2015 BETWEEN:-
1. SONNAPPA LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O KUPPUR VILLAGE HASANDAHALLI POST MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT.
2. THIMMAKKA W/O SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O KUPPUR VILLAGE HASANDAHALLI POST MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT.
3. MUNIRAJU S/O SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O KUPPUR VILLAGE HASANDAHALLI POST MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT.
4. SHOBA D/O SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O KUPPUR VILLAGE HASANDAHALLI POST MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT.
5. KADIRAPPA @ KUMARAPPA S/O DODDANARASIMHAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SCHEDULED CASE AGRICULTURIST R/O KONDRAHALLI BELLAPURA (KAMBEEPURA), KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT.
6. LAKSHMAMMA W/O KADIRAPPA @ KUMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS SCHEDULED CASE BISCUIT FACTORY WORK R/O KONDRAHALLI BELLAPURA (KAMBEEPURA), KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT.
7. NAVITHA D/O KADIRAPPA @ KUMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS SCHEDULED CASE R/O KONDRAHALLI BELLAPURA (KAMBEEPURA), KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT.
(BY SRI: BASAVARAJU T.A, ADV., (ABSENT)) AND:-
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY POLICE INSPECTOR (I.O) ... PETITIONERS ANUGONDANAHALLI POLICE STATION BANGALURU-560016.
2. KAVITHA D/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS SCHEDULED CAST R/AT DODDADUNNASANDRA VILLAGE ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560047.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: CHETAN DESAI, HCGP FOR R-1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.13/2014 REGISTERED BY ANUGONDANAHALLI POLICE, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, FOR AN OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 420, 376, 504, 323, 354, 506, 313, 114 R/W 149 OF IPC, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) AND JMFC AT HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation.
Inspite of grant of number of adjournments, office objections are not complied. It appears that the petitioners and their counsel are no more interested to go on with the case. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR