Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Solanki vs Indian

High Court Of Gujarat|08 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has contended that petitioner has made an averment on oath in the memo of petition that respondents did not fulfill the essential condition of residence, as she was not resident of village: Thara and she is resident of village: Un, despite this, the candidature is considered and accepted.
Notice returnable on 11.06.2012. Any allotment, if made, will be subject matter of this petition. Direct service permitted.
(S.R.BRAHMBHATT, J.) pallav Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Solanki vs Indian

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
08 May, 2012

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.