Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Narashima Battachariar vs The Joint Commissioner

Madras High Court|04 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to pass orders on his application made under Section 54 (1) of HR & CE Act, dated 14.12.2016, and the subsequent representation, dated 20.12.2016, by appointing him as Hereditary Trustee of Arulmigu Kariyamanicka Perumal Tirukovil, situated at Ayanavaram, Chennai  23.
2. The case of the petitioner, as stated in the affidavit, filed in support of this Writ Petition in short, is that, as per the order, dated 03.04.1941, passed in O.A.No.230 of 1940, the petitioner's great grandfather, by name Rangasamy Battachariar was the Hereditary Trustee of the aforementioned Temple. Thereafter, his son, by name Srinivasa Battachariyar, viz., petitioner's grandfather held the said post. Subsequently, the petitioner's father, by name Santhanam Battachariar succeeded to the said post. The petitioner states that since his father was unwell, he gave a representation to the respondent, dated 22.08.2016, requesting the respondent to relieve him from the said post and to appoint his son, i.e., the petitioner as a Hereditary Trustee. Since the said representation evoked no response, the petitioner submitted an application under Section 54 (1) of H.R. & C.E. Act, dated 14.12.2016, setting forth his case and to appoint him as Hereditary Trustee of the Temple, which has also been followed by a representation, dated 20.12.2016. As the petitioner has not been favoured with any response, he is constrained to approach this Court, by way of filing the present Writ Petition.
3. The learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent, on instructions, has submitted that the matter is pending before the respondent/Joint Commissioner and that appropriate orders would be passed by the respondent and he prayed that, reasonable time may be given for passing orders.
4. In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to consider the application made by the petitioner, dated 14.12.2016, which has been followed by a representation, dated 20.12.2016, and after hearing all the parties concerned, pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
04.01.2017 sd Index : yes/no To The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai- 34.
B.Rajendran, J.
sd Writ Petition No.44729 of 2016 04.01.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Narashima Battachariar vs The Joint Commissioner

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 January, 2017