Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Smt.Alka vs Unknown

High Court Of Gujarat|13 February, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the petition is called-out and taken-up for hearing, Mr. Vakil, learned advocate for the petitioners, is not present. Mr. Champaneri, learned Asst. Solicitor General for the respondent No.1 is also not present. Mr. Desai, learned advocate, appearing for Mr. Sachin Vasacada, objector, is present. M/s. Nanavati Associates, learned advocates, appearing for the lessors is also not present. Mr. Upadhayay, learned advocate, appearing for the workers is present. He submitted that he is supporting the scheme. Ms. Raval, learned advocate for the State Bank of India, is present. She has submitted that the claim of State Bank of India has been paid/settled.
Since Mr. Vakil, learned advocate for the petitioners, is not present, S.O. to 24.2.2012.
(K.M.Thaker, J.) kdc Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt.Alka vs Unknown

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
13 February, 2012