Heard.
We find no merit in the special leave petition. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly. However, on the facts of the case, petitioner is granted time till 31st August, 2010 to vacate the premises in question on furnishing usual undertaking in this Court within four weeks from today."
After the said order in question has been passed, review application in question has been filed and therein in view of the averments mentioned in paragraphs 2 to 17 of the affidavit, pertaining to shop in tenancy of Naurangi Lal judgment passed by this Court has been sought to be asked for review of the same.
In the present case each and every aspect of the matter has been examined at length including the matter in respect of Naurangi Lal then in the garb of review re-hearing cannot be permitted. Order passed by this Court on merit has been affirmed by Hon'ble Apex Court and Hon'ble Apex Court has clearly proceeded to mention that there is no merit in the Special Leave petition and Special Leave petition was dismissed accordingly and time has been accorded to vacate the premises in question. Once in the Special Leave Petition, no merit has been found and on earlier occasion, both question of bonafide need and comparative hardship has been considered at length, including the issue of Naurangi Lal and period of long drawn litigation has also been considered and dealt with then no case at all is made out for review of the order passed by this Court, then as already mentioned above in the garb of the review re-hearing at full length cannot be permitted.
Consequently, review application is rejected accordingly. No order as to cost.
Dated 10.05.2010 Dhruv