Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA and perused the record.
The investigating officer, on completion of the investigation, found sufficient materials against the applicant and accordingly submitted the charge sheet. The learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences. The materials collected during the investigation fully justify submission of the charge sheet by the investigating officer and taking of cognizance by the Magistrate. There does not appear to be any justification to exercise inherent power under section 482 CrPC. It is however, provided that the bail prayer of the applicant Smt. Sumitra Jaiswal in case crime no. 103 of 2009 under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, police station Mahila Thana Rakabganj, district Agra shall be disposed of by the courts below in the light of the principles laid down in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh versus State of U.P. & others (2009) 4 SCC 437.
With the aforesaid observations, the petition under section 482 CrPC is disposed off finally.
Order Date :- 22.1.2010 MTA