Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Smt. Shahnaz Bano vs Prescribed Authority/Judge ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Petitioner claims to be the land-lady of the premises in dispute. She is stated to have made an application under Section 21 (1) (a) of U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 being Case No. 13 of 2008. She seeks disposal of the aforesaid proceedings out of turn.
I am of the considered opinion that no mandamus as prayed for need be issued, inasmuch as large number of cases of earlier years of same nature are pending consideration before the Court concerned and no facts have been disclosed for justifying jumping of the queue by the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to make an application for early disposal of the proceedings before the Court concerned itself and in case such application has already been made, the Court concerned may consider the same at the earliest possible.
(Arun Tandon, J.) Order Date :- 28.6.2010 Sushil/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt. Shahnaz Bano vs Prescribed Authority/Judge ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 June, 2010