Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Smt. Naseem Fatma vs State Of U.P. And 8 Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2016

JUDGMENT / ORDER

List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the opposite parties.
Sri Arvind Kumar, Advocate, has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No.2 but no counter affidavit has been filed. The other two opposite parties No.8 and 9 Sabnam alias Gudiya and Saziya have also been sufficiently served.
On behalf of the State it has been indicated that in the First Information Report there is one more accused Ashraf Khan. He has not been made party.
List in the next cause list.
Meanwhile, learned counsel for the applicant, if so advised, may do needful.
Order Date :- 27.7.2016 G.S
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt. Naseem Fatma vs State Of U.P. And 8 Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2016
Judges
  • Pratyush Kumar

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.