Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.M.Savarinathan vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras High Court|22 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to make necessary arrangements for conducting Temple Deity Car Procession on 24.06.2017 through Malaiyappapuram Street, Musiri, Tiruchirappalli District, by way of issuing a Writ of Mandamus.
2.Mr.K.Guru, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Considering the nature of the relief sought in the writ petition, notice need not be sent to the fourth respondent.
3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 has contended to the effect that with regard to right mentioned in the petition, a civil suit is pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Musiri.
4.Considering pendency of a civil suit with regard to right mentioned in the petition, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
5.In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed in part without costs and the third respondent is directed to look into the representation dated 20.06.2017 and dispose of the same within a period of two days. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri Revenue Division, Musiri, Trichy District.
2.The Tahsildar, Musiri Taluk, Musiri, Trichy District.
3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Musiri, Trichy District..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.M.Savarinathan vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2017