IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.52988/2017& WRIT PETITION No.52989/2017 & WRIT PETITION Nos.56443-56445/2017(LB-RES) BETWEEN:
1. Smart Value Homes (Peenya Project) Pvt. Ltd., Having its registered office at Trade World, B Wing, 2nd Floor, Kamala Mills, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai-400 013.
Regional Office: Corniche Al-Latheef Ground Floor-A Wing, No.25, Cunningham Road, Bengaluru-560 052.
Reptd. by its Authorized Signatory Mr. Umakanth.
2. Tata Value Homes Limited Having its registered office at Times Tower, 12th Floor, Kamala Mills Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai-400 013.
Regional Office-Corniche Al-Latheef Ground Floor-A Wing, No.25, Cunningham Road, Bengaluru-560 052.
Rept. by its Authorized Signatory Mr.Umakanth. ... Petitioners (By Ms.Meenakshy Natesan, Advocate of J. Sagar Associates) AND:
1. The Panchayat Development Officer, Huskur Gram Panchayat Office, Huskur, Dasanarapura Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru-562 162.
2. Chief Executive Officer Zilla Panchayat, Zilla Panchayat Office, KG Road, 1st Main Road, Bengaluru-560 009.
3. The State of Karnataka Rept. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, M.S.Building, Bengaluru-560 001. ... Respondents (By Sri M. Pradeep, Advocate for R1; R2 Served;
Sri M.A.Subramani, HCGP for R3) These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct respondent No.1 to respond to the representations made by the petitioners vide Annexure-P and etc.
These Writ Petitions coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 08.04.2019, which reads as follows:
“The undersigned respectfully states that subsequent to the last date of hearing before this Hon’ble Court, the Respondents have agreed to consider the Petitioner’s representation seeking issuance of e-khata within a reasonable time and proceed further accordingly.
The Petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings if the Respondent fails to consider the Petitioner’s representation favourably.”
2. The petitioners state that in view of the respondents taking up for consideration the petitioners’ representation, petitioners may be permitted to withdraw these petitions.
3. Petitioners also seek liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, if respondents fail to consider the petitioners’ representation.
Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court, if the respondents fail to consider the petitioners’ representation.
No orders are required to be passed on I.A.No.2/2018, in view of the disposal of these petitions.
Sd/-
JUDGE RB