Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Kesavan vs The Authorized Officer

Madras High Court|16 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Judgment of the Court was made by THE CHIEF JUSTICE ) When this Writ Petition is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the entire amount has been settled having deposited the same before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The learned counsel would submit that the original documents lying with the respondent bank which were deposited while creating equitable mortgage may be directed to be returned to the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank has undertaken to return all the original documents as soon as they obtained money from the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The respondent bank shall return the documents forthwith as soon as they receive the money from the Tribunal, preferably within a month. No costs. Consequently, connected WMP is closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Kesavan vs The Authorized Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 March, 2017