Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Kalaiselvan vs The Chairman

Madras High Court|24 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Cock Fight in the place mentioned in the petition, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.
2.Mr.D.Muruganandam, learned Additional Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.
3.It is seen from the records that on 10.02.2017 a representation has been given, but the same has not been considered. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the fifth respondent is directed to look into the representation dated 10.02.2017 and dispose of the same within a period of two days.
To
1.The Chairman, (Secretary for Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Committee under the Prevention of Cruelly to Animals Act, 1960), Fort St. George, Chennai ? 600 009.
2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.
3.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.
4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.
5.The Inspector of Police, Rajkkamangalam Police Station, Kanyakumari District.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Kalaiselvan vs The Chairman

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 February, 2017