Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Jeevitha vs The Special Commissioner For ...

Madras High Court|01 August, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents, in particular the 3rd respondent from in any way interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment in running bunk shop in the line of Poonamallee High Road, by the side of Private Company, Opp. Gupta & Co., Ramapuram, Chennai - 89 pending disposal of her representation dated 05.11.2015 for issuance of licence for her above said bunk shop.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in similar circumstances, the Division Bench of this court, by order dated 28.02.2017, passed the following order:-
"5.On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, suffice it to direct the Vending Committee constituted vide G.O.(4D)No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.1.2017 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. All the ground urged in this petition can be raised before the Committee."
4. Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents submitted that the order passed by the Division Bench of this court can be followed in this writ petition also.
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, I direct the Vending Committee constituted vide G.O.(4D)No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.11.2015 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. All the grounds urged in this writ petition can be raised before the Committee."
With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Jeevitha vs The Special Commissioner For ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
01 August, 2017