Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sitara vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 40
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5034 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sitara Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 05 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Kalim Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State.
The petitioner has come up praying for a direction that the investigation be conducted fairly and properly which has not been concluded as yet inspite of the fact that the petitioner who is the victim has already got her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. on 13.12.2017.
We are not aware of any further steps having been taken in the matter but if the investigation has not yet been concluded, the concerned Investigating Officer shall proceed to do the needful in accordance with law.
In the event, the petitioner is still aggrieved then the petitioner can approach the respondent no. 2 Senior Superintendent of Police, Saharanpur for redressal of the grievances.
Disposed of with the said directions.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018 S.Chaurasia
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sitara vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
Advocates
  • Mohd Kalim